don't see your point--the link here only takes me to a page where the only posts I made was showing what actual NASA experts say about real world possibilities for what they call a "Warp drive" vs the warp drive of ST
they are two different things-the guy is quoted in the article as saying that much, not me.
according to NASA and their associates, the only thing real world possibilities (for which a energy source-they say-does not and probably will not ever, exist) for warp drive and ST has is similar names
---------------------------------------------------------
And--here is a real post of mine--since you keep pushing for an argument--showing why much of what is in ST is fantasy in the way that it does not exist now (of course) and why it can net EVER exist
transporters and the Heisenberg Compensator is one thing. Another (not in this video) is the amount of energy required just to scan,upload and dissemble one person far exceeds the amount of energy released from all of the nuclear weapons we have today.
Just more scientific fantasy- why don't you invite this guy to the forum and argue with him?--I'll get the popcorn
So just stop trying to bait me for this silly argument
Both movies/shows are imaginary, works of fiction. Most importantly, they are forms of entertainment and diversion-nothing more
So, you and OM and whomever else should just start a "Squee" thread for ST where you all can argue over who loves ST more