Terran77
Captain Tightpants
Tell them, "pics of your dated cable bill cancellation or it didn't happen and you're talking total BS!"
Syfy Forums
- Thread starter McSheppard
- Start date
G
Graybrew1
Guest
Tell them, "pics of your dated cable bill cancellation or it didn't happen and you're talking total BS!"
Nothing would work. Pointless.
Mr. A
Super Moderator +
Very true. Specially when one considers than many of them don't even live in the US...
G
Graybrew1
Guest
Very true. Specially when one considers than many of them don't even live in the US...
Supposedly the ones claiming it do. One of them is our good friend Mr. Themaingmaster.
S
Stonelesscutter
Guest
I'm gonna cancel SyFy channel for sure!
G
Graybrew1
Guest
Do you even get it?
S
Stonelesscutter
Guest
G
Graybrew1
Guest
No.
That was the ironic part.
Sorry, haha.
Mr. A
Super Moderator +
I'll do better: I won't even subscribe to start with!
S
Stonelesscutter
Guest
Mr. A
Super Moderator +
Yes, I've heard everywhere that he's been causing a lot of trouble over at Syfy. I read the latest altercation involving, among others, Gatefan'76, Cimmer and yourself, and since I suspected it was going to be erased I saved Uxmal's excellent posts directed at this TMGM dude. You can read TMGM's comments from Uxmal's quotes:
(Sorry, I seemed to have missed Cimmer's this time, though
But She is always welcome to come here comment for herself if she wishes )
Mr. A
Super Moderator +
Basically this TMGM guy claimed that people who didn't like SGU and didn't watch it beyond the first episodes just weren't open-minded to change - another one of the subtle digs at SGA and SG1 fans, as if there were something wrong with them and not with the show. And completely ignoring the fact that many Stargate fans did in fact give SGU a chance to start with but gave up at some point.
Before Uxmal tackled that post, Cimmer had a brilliant response to it (Uxmal praised it in his post). Very civil, as is usually the case for her, but also very to the point.
Like I said before, I messed up and lost it, so I'll post the only bits that I have found. If the rest pops up I'll post it here, because it is an excellent read.
Before Uxmal tackled that post, Cimmer had a brilliant response to it (Uxmal praised it in his post). Very civil, as is usually the case for her, but also very to the point.
Like I said before, I messed up and lost it, so I'll post the only bits that I have found. If the rest pops up I'll post it here, because it is an excellent read.
Unfortunately that's all I have for now (more will come). But it's enough to show that it was indeed wrong IMO for the mods to delete that comment in particular. Cimmer is neither addressing TMGM nor flaming him - she just refutes the merits (i.e. the lack thereof) of his argument.
G
Graybrew1
Guest
Basically this TMGM guy claimed that people who didn't like SGU and didn't watch it beyond the first episodes just weren't open-minded to change - another one of the subtle digs at SGA and SG1 fans, as if there were something wrong with them and not with the show. And completely ignoring the fact that many Stargate fans did in fact give SGU a chance to start with but gave up at some point.
Before Uxmal tackled that post, Cimmer had a brilliant response to it (Uxmal praised it in his post). Very civil, as is usually the case for her, but also very to the point.
Like I said before, I messed up and lost it, so I'll post the only bits that I have found. If the rest pops up I'll post it here, because it is an excellent read.
Unfortunately that's all I have for now (more will come). But it's enough to show that it was indeed wrong IMO for the mods to delete that comment in particular. Cimmer is neither addressing TMGM nor flaming him - she just refutes the merits (i.e. the lack thereof) of his argument.
TBH, I don't think my original couple of posts were either. I tried to be careful in the beginning. I simply pointed out what he said and did not allow him to back out of it. I also gave him a chance to apologize for it and he refused..........then things got ugly.
Interestingly enough, BTW, not a single new posts has been put on the Syfy SGU thread since TGTM covered them at 12:22pm today. Now, THAT is not a coincidence folks. :icon_e_wink:
"covered them"? Im not sure I understand...is he a Mod or something?
G
Graybrew1
Guest
Sorry, I should have said, blanketed them. I looked and his name was all that I saw.
G
Graybrew1
Guest
I have been spending some extra time in Syfy forums lately. I went and got myself into not one but two heated debates.
OH Me Oh My. How do I do this to myself.
http://forums.syfy.com/index.php?showtopic=2357550&st=20
http://forums.syfy.com/index.php?showtopic=2315428&view=findpost&p=6985889
The First one is from Sanctuary thread and the second one is from SPN.
To be honest I probably incited the SPN debate, but I mean what I said in both of them.
OH Me Oh My. How do I do this to myself.
http://forums.syfy.com/index.php?showtopic=2357550&st=20
http://forums.syfy.com/index.php?showtopic=2315428&view=findpost&p=6985889
The First one is from Sanctuary thread and the second one is from SPN.
To be honest I probably incited the SPN debate, but I mean what I said in both of them.
B
Backstep
Guest
GB i think you're confusing Jack the Ripper killings and Spring-heeled Jack. Yes Watson suspected Druitt but as Helen stated to Watson, "by now you should have found the correct killer" and went out to find Jack to try and bring him in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_Heeled_Jack
G
Graybrew1
Guest
No I am just debating the point of argument that Druitt has not be proven to be Jack the Ripper. I do believe that Druitt killed others, but I don't see it being guaranteed like this one poster did that he was proven to be Jack the Ripper. I also, feel it is a TV show and the storyline is not over.
The SyFy poster has a valid point. Helen went back to a point in time 10 years after the Whitechapel murders (Jack the Ripper). In the Sanctuary timeline she had confronted John over the killings a decade ago. So having Springheel Jack commit a second series of killings is fully compatible with the storyline.