SciphonicStranger
Objects may be closer than they appear
Yeah, I'm not sure they're so great for holding burgers and beer bottles.
Is vaping allowed in movie theaters? In California I mean...
Yeah, I'm not sure they're so great for holding burgers and beer bottles.
Is vaping allowed in movie theaters? In California I mean...
Only if you have an Magic Flight (they wont know). I would never try it, but I will definitely be "prepared" before going in, and if I want I can recharge after the first movie. I think I will just see one movie. Im not up for two blockbusters. Im leaving now...
LOL, I am so out of that loop that I had to look that product up.
http://www.amazon.com/Latest-Model-...75868&sr=8-1&keywords=magic-flight+launch+box
This thing looks complicated.
View attachment 7462
Well that's all I need to know. Looks like I'll wait til it comes to cable.
Well that's all I need to know. Looks like I'll wait til it comes to cable.
Yeah TAS, while a good movie (and superior to Spiderman 1 & 3), isn't really all that. Enjoyable, but not that memorable. As someone who's seen both, I'm definitely advising to see TDKR on the big screen instead.
This is a bit different than the glowing OP! Still, this was not a horrible movie. I enjoyed the ride, and it felt like a ride and not really a Spiderman saga. Andrew Garfield did a great job with his character, but that character could have easily been any superhero. Pigeon Man, Technoman, Pizza Man, whatever. The action-y parts were cool, but IMO they strayed too far away from the original Spiderman in most every element as to be SINO (Spiderman in name only). Too much schmaltz thrown in, bad attempts at humor, dumbed down premise (as opposed to the original), .Short list of peeves:
- When did Peter Parker become a master scientist capable of creating tensile liquid threads strong enough to suspend cars from a bridge, as well as the devices needed to generate them on demand?
- If so, why is Peter still in high school? (if they had not introduced the techno aspect of his web thingys, they could have gotten away with it)
- Why the forced "hip elements" like the skateboarding, the music montages, the dark wet streets with steam jets... haven't they done that one to death?
- Gwen...if she is 17, why can she access the top secret areas of Oscorp?
- How did Peter get into the top secret lab, into the inner sanctum, wearing a fake name tag and knowing nothing of the security systems?
Why did the producers rush through the origins of Spiderman and his abilities? Its because they wanted to get right to the CGI and lizard scenes. The character development in this movie sucked badly. But the overall movie was enjoyable. This movie to me has little rewatch value, and the next one will also be watched at home and not in a theater. Not a horrible movie, but not great.
Meh.
This is a bit different than the glowing OP! Still, this was not a horrible movie. I enjoyed the ride, and it felt like a ride and not really a Spiderman saga. Andrew Garfield did a great job with his character, but that character could have easily been any superhero. Pigeon Man, Technoman, Pizza Man, whatever. The action-y parts were cool, but IMO they strayed too far away from the original Spiderman in most every element as to be SINO (Spiderman in name only). Too much schmaltz thrown in, bad attempts at humor, dumbed down premise (as opposed to the original), .Short list of peeves:
- When did Peter Parker become a master scientist capable of creating tensile liquid threads strong enough to suspend cars from a bridge, as well as the devices needed to generate them on demand?
- If so, why is Peter still in high school? (if they had not introduced the techno aspect of his web thingys, they could have gotten away with it)
- Why the forced "hip elements" like the skateboarding, the music montages, the dark wet streets with steam jets... haven't they done that one to death?
- Gwen...if she is 17, why can she access the top secret areas of Oscorp?
- How did Peter get into the top secret lab, into the inner sanctum, wearing a fake name tag and knowing nothing of the security systems?
Why did the producers rush through the origins of Spiderman and his abilities? Its because they wanted to get right to the CGI and lizard scenes. The character development in this movie sucked badly. But the overall movie was enjoyable. This movie to me has little rewatch value, and the next one will also be watched at home and not in a theater. Not a horrible movie, but not great.
Meh.
yep same for the animated show.I got the impression that stuff came from Oscorp. He received a box of the stuff, packed in neat little cartridges. He only developed the wrist-band web shooter.
The web material was being made in Oscorp by these enhanced spiders that we saw in the room during the scene where spiders started to rain on Peter. Unless I missed something and wasn't paying attention, I don't think he created or even enhanced any of that.
In the comic books, though, he was a genius student who created the entire web compound himself in his home lab, which was in his bedroom, if I recall.
yep same for the animated show.
I got the impression that stuff came from Oscorp. He received a box of the stuff, packed in neat little cartridges. He only developed the wrist-band web shooter.
The web material was being made in Oscorp by these enhanced spiders that we saw in the room during the scene where spiders started to rain on Peter. Unless I missed something and wasn't paying attention, I don't think he created or even enhanced any of that.
In the comic books, though, he was a genius student who created the entire web compound himself in his home lab, which was in his bedroom, if I recall.
why are you asking me? i havnt seen this shitfeast of a movie and i most likly never will..True, but why the skateboard add-ins? Why did they put Gwen at Oscorp? Why is she a tour guide there when she is only 17 (in the movie), and what was wrong with updating MJ instead of creating Gwen? Why the early reveal? This Peter Parker pulled off the character well, but not the science. The original trilogy of movies did this better than the current one. IMO The only "tech" I saw in Peter's bedroom was that lame electric door lock.
True, but why the skateboard add-ins? Why did they put Gwen at Oscorp? Why is she a tour guide there when she is only 17 (in the movie), and what was wrong with updating MJ instead of creating Gwen? Why the early reveal? This Peter Parker pulled off the character well, but not the science. The original trilogy of movies did this better than the current one. IMO The only "tech" I saw in Peter's bedroom was that lame electric door lock.
and in the the animated goblin sent her to another dimension i think.. why are you guys even arguing this? its a SUPERHERO themed movie and we all know in the comic superhero movie universes there int really "canon" since each story has been ripped up retold or discarded atleast a hundred times each depending on which artis/writer/douche owned the rights at that point in time...Originally in the comics, Gwen actually was Peter's love interest before MJ. I them he didn't even meet MJ until after he was out of high school and Gwen had died when he attempted to save her after the Green Goblin dropped her from a bridge, the same event we saw in the first Spider-Man movie, only with MJ instead of Gwen, and MJ actually surviving.
and in the the animated goblin sent her to another dimension i think.. why are you guys even arguing this? its a SUPERHERO themed movie and we all know in the comic superhero movie universes there int really "canon" since each story has been ripped up retold or discarded atleast a hundred times each depending on which artis/writer/douche owned the rights at that point in time...
seriously.. this is just...