Blade Runner 2049

Discussion in 'Science Fiction Movies' started by PussyGalore, Oct 9, 2017.

  1. PussyGalore

    PussyGalore No insecure women (or their beta cucks) please!

    Reputation:
    99,990
    #1. I haven't seen this one yet but I might actually go see it at the theater because it looks good. If anyone has seen it please give a review.

    #2. The media seems to be trying to shit all over this movie for some unknown reason. There have been a slew of negative articles claiming gender bias and male favoritism in the movie. Personally I don't give a shit about that and I find it to be nothing but nonsensical whining. The original was a cool movie and I'm hoping the sequel is the same.

    #3. There has also been a lot of claims that this film is already a box office failure when the truth might be different. This film was released on October 6th, three days ago and has made $82,000,000 million worldwide in that time. That is more than half of its $150,000,000 million budget. In three days. It hasn't even been an entire week yet. It seems too early to count this one out but I guess we shall see.

    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=bladerunnersequel.htm

    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
  2. PussyGalore

    PussyGalore No insecure women (or their beta cucks) please!

    Reputation:
    99,990
    OMG this woman, Aimee Lutkin, is an idiot, and an arrogant one to boot. That's a dangerous combination in a person, especially one with ovaries because that always seems to override the rational faculty of the human brain. For starters she claims a $200,000,000 million budget for this movie which is a figure she pulled out of her flabby ass. The estimated budget for this film is $150,000,000 million, that's $50 million less than this cow claims (check IMDB). Where did she get that figure? No one knows. And she doesn't have to prove the legitimacy of the figure she came up with because she has a vagina. She can say anything she wants because she's a woman and if you challenge her you automatically become a rapist pig. Long live the gynocracy! :rolleye0014:

    She also claims that this movie "fell flat on its face" because "ladies" weren't buying tickets to it. Um, yeah, Blade Runner was never a "chick flick" you stupid cow. Women never comprised the majority of the fan base of the original movie. In fact, there really was no female lead in the original film. "Rachel" (played by Sean Young) was essentially secondary to Deckard and Roy Batty, the male leads of the film. BR is a guy film. It always has been and always will be. Women buying tickets to the sequel was never a prediction or expectation. Give it up you brain-dead slag.

    The rest of this moron's "review" of a movie she most likely did not see, as proven by her statement in the article, is making my brain melt. Feel free to check it out yourself at the link below but be warned, stupidity lies ahead. Aimee Lutkin is truly a moronic human being who uses her vagina as a cognitive tool and it shows. If anyone deserves to get cancer for being an idiot it's this woman. She's an intellectual POS.

    https://jezebel.com/blade-runner-2049-flopped-at-the-box-office-because-wom-1819277271
     
    • Interesting Interesting x 1
  3. Tripler

    Tripler Well Known GateFan

    Reputation:
    169,871
    I for one am a huge huge huge fan of Blade Runner . I have every directors cut which I believe adds up to 6 different DVD's and the Collectors Blade Runner kit with the miniature flying cop car in the box which I have never opened . I also have the soundtrack , and the game .The original movie was not as good as I hoped it would be but I still loved it . The whole premise and the 6 year limit of the Nexus Robots set the stage for the Nexus 6 lifelike Droids and there wish to live longer . It's a wonderful movie and Harrison Ford was just awesome as the top Blade Runner . It showed a bit of a dystopian future and it made you feel that our future could steer that way . A flying car chase was all that movie was missing but that was fine by me as I think Star Wars had been out a bit and we were expecting a flying chase around the city which never happened . Bet we will see it this time around tho . The Nexus Bots in the original really were the center here and it worked well .
    I will definitely be going to see this ...

    :)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Tripler

    Tripler Well Known GateFan

    Reputation:
    169,871
    Just read that dumb asses review . So its wrong to have a movie that would cater to a guy only apparently with her . Why would that matter ? And what's wrong with that !

    Sheese ,,,
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. Overmind One

    Overmind One GateFans Gatemaster Staff Member

    Reputation:
    646,242
    There is a term "Chick Flick", but not one for us fellas. Perhaps it's the default? But the fact that Blade Runner is not a romcom, or a romance or love story (no, Rachael/Deckhard is not what the movie is about), then why change it to appeal directly to women? That will change it completely. Look what happened when The Stepford Wives got tossed into the ladies room....nobody is a robot, all the women are cured and the men get bitched.

    I think some movies are women's movies, even though I like them like The Devil Wears Prada and Fatal Attraction.
     
  6. PussyGalore

    PussyGalore No insecure women (or their beta cucks) please!

    Reputation:
    99,990
    What really gets me is that the chick who wrote this article has absolutely nothing legitimate to say about the movie. She's snarky and malicious for no reason and constructs an argument that has no substance. Her mendacity in describing this film, that she hasn't seen, is egregious. She outright lies that this movie is failing at the box office and falsely claims it's because women aren't buying tickets to see it. :rolleye0014:

    Here's the truth: The movie has only been out for 3 days and has made back over 50% of its budget. That is not failure. After 3 weeks maybe. After 3 months definitely. But making back more than half the cost to make the damn thing in only 3 days is pretty damn good.

    Additionally, it's not a movie aimed at a female audience. Women were never expected to buy tickets en masse to see it. It's a male-centric film that mimics its predecessor which was also a male-centric film replete with male lead characters. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that.

    This woman is an idiot who should not be allowed anywhere near a keyboard.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
Loading...

Share This Page