So far there are laws in some but not all US states about cyberstalking/cyberharassment and also cyberbullying (the "bullying" term as far as the laws go only refers to when the target of harassment is a minor). Anyways, I was actually reading the CA code about this last night, and from what I can tell, none of the behavior on either side (meaning GW and here) meets the legal definitions of cyberstalking.
Indirectly making fun of someone online is not cyberstalking (although for cyberbullying some laws are a little bit stricter). So, for example, making fun of certain GW mods on this site is not cyberstalking, since the targets of the mockery are free to ignore this forum (in contrast, sending repeated direct email messages to said mods would be starting to shift into the stalking arena, but still other conditions in the messages would need to be met, I'll get into that more below). Also, trying to get someone banned by association is not stalking, either.
Cyberstalking requires the plaintiff to prove that someone not only
engaged in a pattern of behavior with the intent to follow, harass, or alarm the plaintiff, but also that
as a result of said conduct the plaintiff "reasonably feared" for his or her safety and the defendant also had to
make a credible threat with the intent to place the plaintiff in reasonable fear for his or her safety and then the plaintiff had to
ignore a direct request by the plaintiff to stop their behavior.
So, there are a lot of factors that need to be met there. Based on those requirements, no one is cyberstalking anyone (at least not on the forums, I have no knowledge of PMs and emails). But that doesn't mean there isn't some crazy ridiculous conduct from the GW mods! The misconduct is infuriating, but it is nothing anyone could successfully sue over, unfortunately...
Of course I'll put my usual disclaimer that I'm not a lawyer and am just basing this stuff off of reading the laws online
Also sorry if I went overboard with the formatting I was trying to make the key points stand out.