I am excited about this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...2f650c-df99-11e1-8d48-2b1243f34c85_story.html
WARNING: Cheesy commercial and overly made up news achors used as filler....:icon_e_biggrin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oLaC1VYoTM
This rover is very important. It will last for YEARS longer than the original rovers. It has more advanced equipment, a better vehicular design, and a much higher resolution camera. I am hoping that it is not used for stupid missions like stacking rocks or drawing pictures in the martian soil, through some obscure science grant allowing it. Of course, that is a way out there scenario. What is not so way out is that this rover will confirm what scientists believe happened 36 years ago in 1976, and that is the discovery of LIFE on Mars. Thats right, according to some scientists, the original Mars Viking probes found life on the red planet, but the results of the tests may have been misinterpreted.
http://news.discovery.com/space/mars-life-viking-landers-discovery-120412.html
Interesting. Overlooked, or covered up? That is another thread in the (not yet created) Conspiracy Forums
The Curiosity is not a small rover. Here is what it looks like next to people. As big or bigger than some cars:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...2f650c-df99-11e1-8d48-2b1243f34c85_story.html
WARNING: Cheesy commercial and overly made up news achors used as filler....:icon_e_biggrin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oLaC1VYoTM
This rover is very important. It will last for YEARS longer than the original rovers. It has more advanced equipment, a better vehicular design, and a much higher resolution camera. I am hoping that it is not used for stupid missions like stacking rocks or drawing pictures in the martian soil, through some obscure science grant allowing it. Of course, that is a way out there scenario. What is not so way out is that this rover will confirm what scientists believe happened 36 years ago in 1976, and that is the discovery of LIFE on Mars. Thats right, according to some scientists, the original Mars Viking probes found life on the red planet, but the results of the tests may have been misinterpreted.
http://news.discovery.com/space/mars-life-viking-landers-discovery-120412.html
New analysis of 36-year-old data, resuscitated from printouts, shows NASA found life on Mars, an international team of mathematicians and scientists conclude in a paper published this week.
Further, NASA doesn't need a human expedition to Mars to nail down the claim, neuropharmacologist and biologist Joseph Miller, with the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, told Discovery News.
"The ultimate proof is to take a video of a Martian bacteria. They should send a microscope -- watch the bacteria move," Miller said.
"On the basis of what we've done so far, I'd say I'm 99 percent sure there's life there," he added.
Interesting. Overlooked, or covered up? That is another thread in the (not yet created) Conspiracy Forums
The Curiosity is not a small rover. Here is what it looks like next to people. As big or bigger than some cars: