If your name is not on the signage as a partner, and your name is not on anyone's paychecks, you have no business challenging the management, ethics or practices of said company. Your choices are to adapt and get what you can from the situation, or to leave for a better situation. People who get in companies and think they are Neo in The Matrix, by challenging the Agents of the system and going against the Status Quo are what I call "internal resistance groups". Every company has them. They are people (or cliques of people) who whine and complain about how everything about the company is wrong and could be better if only ____________. But they come to work every day, and check their Bank for their paycheck at midnight on payday. Pointless.
When companies find ways to save money or make a process more efficient to make more profit, does any of the benefit of that trickle down to you? That's what I thought. So why offer up your ideas if you will not get any sort of advantage?
I know another IT guy (Systems Engineer) who is a Task Scheduler and scripting guru. He used the Task Scheduler function in Windows to automate many of the processes in the company he was working for, and the company got him to document the process, how to create new tasks and documented issues with broken tasks. Once they had that, they let him go and hired another guy at half the income to maintain and create new Tasks based upon the documentation. The Employee Handbook/Employee Contract clearly stated that all internal processes are intellectual property, and my friend was shit out of luck legally.
Exactly this, all of this. If your name isn't on the business or you don't sit on the board of directors then you're an employee. It's as simple as that. And even if you receive "profit sharing" or company stock as part of your benefits package you're still just an employee. It's pointless to try and direct and/or change the course of the company because you have no vested interest in doing so and will get nothing out of it. Your company stock and/or "profit sharing" will give you zero leverage to make decisions and changes within the company. And any skills and/or intellectual property you bring to the job belongs to the company.
Additionally, getting involved in company politics is a choice. Filing grievances with HR is a choice, often a bad one. If one has a
legit complaint of abuse that's one thing, but too often people get sucked into an unending merry-go-round of office complaints and it becomes nothing but a waste of time and energy and usually gets you blacklisted on some level.
The bottom line is when you're just an employee recognize that you're just an employee and make your career/work choices based upon that understanding. That doesn't mean you should have a poor work ethic, it simply means that if you choose to invest more of your life into your job than what you're being paid for that is
your decision. If you decide to get involved in office politics that is
your decision. If you are having issues in the workplace and HR or your bosses aren't interested in addressing the problem in a fair manner then it is
your choice to stay or leave that job.
*I realize people often feel "forced" to remain at a job due to pressing financial issues, health insurance, etc. Regardless, if a job becomes untenable it's up to
you to make a change. You are not a slave. You have autonomy. The responsibility for finding a better situation rests on
you, and yes, there are always better situations out there even if that includes starting your own business and becoming your own boss. You don't need an advanced degree to start your own business nor do you need a lot of money. It may not be ideal but it doesn't have to be permanent either. The corporate employment system sucks but that's the world we live in today so it's up to us to sink or swim individually.